It is almost election time again in Los Angeles. Angelenos will have the opportunity to vote on 16 candidates for six open judgeships in the Los Angeles Superior Court. And this is a bad idea.
Most members of the voting public know little to nothing about
judicial candidates. This is not surprising. Judicial candidates cannot
and do not campaign the way other candidates do. In addition, they are
decidedly "down ballot" races, meaning fewer people pay attention to the
candidates towards the end of the ballot.
Why is this a problem? Well, when the public has little information then
each voter should take it upon herself to research that judicial
candidate. That doesn't always happen. But when it does voters are
heavily reliant on a few sources -- the Los Angeles County Bar
Association, which rates candidates on a scale from exceptionally well qualified to not qualified, and the relatively few news outlets, which endorse candidates.
The more frightening (and all-too-likely) scenario occurs when voters do
not look at the candidate ratings or newspaper endorsements. In that
case voters are left to go only by what is on the ballot, which includes
the candidate's name and a short description such as "gang prosecutor"
or "environmental lawyer."
Finish reading this article on KCET.org.